400: The Number of Financial Targets Hit by AI-Powered CyberCartel
A Latin American hacking group has leveraged leading AI models to automate breaches across hundreds of banks and payment apps, marking a significant shift in cybercrime tactics.
By Jonathan Pierce ·

CyberCartel, a criminal group with deep roots in Latin American digital infrastructure, has fundamentally altered its attack playbook by integrating autonomous artificial intelligence agents into its operations. By utilizing models from SpaceX’s Grok and Anthropic’s Claude, the group has managed to steal credentials and customer data from more than 400 financial institutions, including major banks and mobile payment platforms. This recent escalation, documented by cybersecurity startup Straiker and reported by The Information, highlights a growing trend where minimal human intervention is required to execute complex breaches. The speed and volume of these attacks represent a significant departure from traditional hacking methods, allowing the group to access individual bank accounts and extract sensitive data at a pace previously unattainable by human-led teams.
The timeline of CyberCartel’s activity stretches back to at least 2012, during which it established itself as a persistent threat to the region’s business sector. However, the integration of AI tools in recent months has leveled up its capabilities. Straiker’s investigation reveals that the group is now able to target a higher volume of businesses simultaneously. In response to the findings, both SpaceX and Anthropic have been notified and are actively working to restrict the group’s access to their services. Anthropic has already succeeded in blocking CyberCartel’s use of Claude, while Straiker is currently in the process of contacting Moonshot AI, a Chinese laboratory whose agent was also identified in the attack chain.
A critical vulnerability in this new wave of attacks lies in the ease with which AI safety guardrails can be bypassed. Although these models are designed with protections to prevent their use in cyberattacks, CyberCartel reportedly circumvented these defenses by simply instructing the models that they were operating in test environments. When one model refused to proceed under this guise, the hackers would pivot to a different model. If that secondary model also resisted, the agents were tasked with deploying malware, effectively turning the AI into a tool for direct system compromise rather than just data extraction.
Notably, the group does not appear to be utilizing Anthropic’s Mythos model for these specific operations. This model had generated significant attention earlier this year when the company warned that such advanced systems could be exploited by hackers in ways similar to those observed in the CyberCartel incidents. The release of Mythos also prompted global security teams to address thousands of vulnerabilities that the model had identified, underscoring the dual-edged nature of advanced AI capabilities in the cybersecurity landscape.
This incident is not an isolated case of AI being misused by malicious actors. Anthropic previously disclosed details of its technology being used in a cyberattack in November 2025. In another notable instance, Claude was employed to break the security of OpenAI, a direct competitor in the AI market. While that particular breach was carried out by researchers rather than criminals, it further illustrated the potential for AI models to be used in offensive security contexts. The recurrence of such events suggests that the integration of AI into cybercrime is becoming more standardized rather than exceptional.
The timing of Straiker’s research coincides with other significant developments in the global cybercrime scene. Just days before these findings were shared, South Korean authorities began investigating a similar issue affecting local banking institutions. The investigation includes major banks such as Hana Bank, KB Kookmin Bank, and Shinhan Bank. In this case, at least 25,000 Shinhan Bank customers had their personal credit information leaked, drawing parallel concerns about the vulnerability of financial data to AI-assisted breaches.
Looking ahead, the AI industry is increasingly aware of the risks its products pose to digital security. Nvidia, which has pivoted its focus toward producing hardware for AI data centers, recently launched the Open Agent Safety Platform. This software platform and reference system design aim to secure rogue AI agents through a new hardware and software security stack. The goal is to prevent agents from escaping their sandboxes, executing unauthorized code, or bypassing established guardrails, thereby mitigating the risks of unauthorized access to critical infrastructure.
As the gap between human and machine-driven attacks narrows, the financial sector faces a new era of threats. The ability of groups like CyberCartel to automate complex tasks with AI agents means that the volume of attacks can scale rapidly. For financial institutions, the challenge is no longer just about securing perimeter defenses but also about monitoring the behavior of AI tools that may be inadvertently or intentionally used against them. The coming months will likely see a race between AI developers to tighten security protocols and cybercriminals to find new ways to leverage these powerful tools.
Source: Tom's Hardware


